The adoption of electronic medical certificate clearly requires updating for the part of company policy on the certification of the disease.
Under the new system, the physician shall direct the sending of electronic medical certifi-cation to the pension scheme, making it unnecessary to send the recom-delivery or delivery at the counter of the Social Security certificate from the worker.
Pending that action is taken to adapt the business rules for the part relating to sick workers to invite you to pay particular attention to the data reported in the receipt of transmission of electronic certification and in particular the dates of illness certified.
In many cases it happened that doctors probably impractical in the use of information technologies, have indicated in the certificate as a period of days of sickness after those of actual workers' disease, in which case the Company has considered these absences as not justified and considered them worthy of disciplinary context, despite the company being aware of a manifest error since the dispatch of medical and / or delivery of the certificate, all this despite the obvious good faith of the workers who had reported the disease before the start of the tour of duty and had done so successfully sending and / or delivery of cer- tificate showing the wrong dates. This attitude does not appear to inspire business-to the good faith can not be said simply that the absence is unjustified-that the worker has a duty to check the consistency of the data in the certificate. It asks a sick worker, perhaps with a high fever, to verify the data contained on the certificate and it absolves the company from making sure that workers do not officially in the disease, according to the certificate wrong, are present in the company and pay the their normal work during the days of disease specified in the certificate given to the company.
In this way the error of the doctor, superficiality in the review by the sick worker and subsequent superficial corporate gift you a single-manager:
Under the new system, the physician shall direct the sending of electronic medical certifi-cation to the pension scheme, making it unnecessary to send the recom-delivery or delivery at the counter of the Social Security certificate from the worker.
Pending that action is taken to adapt the business rules for the part relating to sick workers to invite you to pay particular attention to the data reported in the receipt of transmission of electronic certification and in particular the dates of illness certified.
In many cases it happened that doctors probably impractical in the use of information technologies, have indicated in the certificate as a period of days of sickness after those of actual workers' disease, in which case the Company has considered these absences as not justified and considered them worthy of disciplinary context, despite the company being aware of a manifest error since the dispatch of medical and / or delivery of the certificate, all this despite the obvious good faith of the workers who had reported the disease before the start of the tour of duty and had done so successfully sending and / or delivery of cer- tificate showing the wrong dates. This attitude does not appear to inspire business-to the good faith can not be said simply that the absence is unjustified-that the worker has a duty to check the consistency of the data in the certificate. It asks a sick worker, perhaps with a high fever, to verify the data contained on the certificate and it absolves the company from making sure that workers do not officially in the disease, according to the certificate wrong, are present in the company and pay the their normal work during the days of disease specified in the certificate given to the company.
In this way the error of the doctor, superficiality in the review by the sick worker and subsequent superficial corporate gift you a single-manager:
the sick worker.
ask the company to remind employees to verify the dates contained in the certificates; also ask the company to ensure that there will be no more one-situations in which professional activity during the disease incorrectly stated in the certificate.
Rome, February 7, 2011
Rsu SLC CGIL
Colagiovanni
Marcello Rosina Pani
Rsu SLC CGIL
Colagiovanni
Marcello Rosina Pani
0 comments:
Post a Comment